Car tax changes: “heavy burden” on drivers and fleets – “unfair”

London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone was expanded last month to include most of London, a size 18 times the size of the original ULEZ introduced in 2018. It is estimated that up to 35,000 vans and 3 000 trucks entering London each day currently do not meet the required Euro 6 emissions standard and will be responsible for the expanded ULEZ charges.

“We quickly realized that without active management the price wouldn’t change, so we created risk management tools that give our fleet customers superpowers.

“Now they are able to shut down all the noise and take the very few corrective actions needed with the riskiest drivers, reduce exposure and therefore lower the cost of insuring that exposure.

“We are independent of the data source, but the premiums are calculated using data.

“We will work with an existing telematics solution already installed in a fleet, recommend or install our own preferred solution or even source data directly from vehicles where connected data capabilities are activated.

“We have two main calculators, one that determines the driving events and the other the risk of crossing a particular location at any given time, which feeds our pricing engine. “

So far, Rideshur has helped fleets reduce accidents by 65%, with every trip and driver assessed to help calculate premiums.

This has been used by drivers to enable them to accurately manage their finances.

Using AI technology, premiums are calculated, personalized and updated in real time, meaning drivers don’t have to wait until the end of the year to see if they can save.

Mr. Musson added: “Without a data-driven solution everything from charge administration to route planning becomes much more difficult.

“We have solutions in place for clients that can automate administration, and our data can prove entry and exit points.

“The way charges are structured and administered by Transport for London is beyond our control, however, our view is that the use of finer tracking and a usage-based system, rather than ‘a time window approach would be more flexible and fairer.

“Charges represent a significant burden on fleets and could be viewed as unfair as operations within ULEZ are often demand driven rather than choice driven.

“We did not actively participate in the ULEZ consultation, however, speaking to our clients, the overall implementation is seen as unfair, structured to drive adoption of electric vehicles, and designed to be particularly punitive for electric vehicles. frequent users, many of whom are fleets. “

Source link

Comments are closed.